Astronomy debunked and Astrology supported by Big Bang Theory
Astronomy debunked by the Big Bang theory that demonstrates the entire Solar System started out as a unified swirling mass from the Big Bang. Eventually the Solar system settled out into the sun and planets and moons but they are still part of the same swirling system with its inherent timing cycles and tides. These timing cycles are best represented in terms of human life by the actual celestial mechanics of the solar system as they are observed within the patterns of the Planet Earth.
These timing cycles are mapped and studied through the symbolic timing analog called the horoscope.
A horoscope is a matrix for psychological study of individuals in terms of general social situations and character types. Astrology touches the discredited pseudoscience of astronomy only where both share the use of solar system planetary positions including the sun and moon.
Astrology uses the timing analog of the horoscope with the celestial cycles of the solar system as a big clock with 10 hands and one dial with 12 symbolic number patterns to it. The foolish astronomer that rejects astrologer judgments is like the poor simpleton who thinks it bad magic that someone at a L.A. gathering could look at his watch, noting it is Friday around 5 pm and pronounce their friend will find terrible gridlock traffic tying up their travel on the freeways.
This astronomer type would decry this pseudoscience nonsense that thinks the ticking of his wristwatch magical contraption can reach out and affect freeway commuters. No, there is no wristwatch rays of influence that affect the roadways. There are timing principles which indicate on a normal Friday of a normal workweek driving the L.A. area freeways will be difficult, frustrating and gridlocked. That is what astrology is all about.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Only astronomy still uses the mythological nonsense of Ptolemy’s constellations. Ptolemy used the common myth names of his time to designate stars groups he called constellations. These groups have no connection to the actual arrangement of stars in our universe.
The astrological signs use the same names as Ptolemy’s constellations of the Zodiac, but they are very differently defined. Ptolemy took swaths of sky which looked to his eyes like mythological figures and named them as constellations following traditional star lore. One constellation will include stars from many star systems, galaxies and anything else. They are logically a mess given contemporary knowledge about the atlas of our Universe. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Unfortunately, astronomers cling to their Ptolemy, attacking his illogical notions of astrology instead of learning about real astrological timing analysis or horoscopes. Astronomy debunked by their whining complaints that the astrological signs no longer match Ptolemy’s myth based constellations. There is nothing objectively real about any of Ptolemy’s constellations.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.

Ptolemy measured the observed positions of the planets in terms of his assumption that all celestial motion was eternal, perfect circles. However, to match the exact details of his observations he required epicycles for retrograde motion. Hardly a simple or even logical notion to have these needlessly complicated geometrical tricks. Further observation required more epicycles to approximate the actual elliptical orbits.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astrology only uses the planetary positions are timing markers, having no problem with retrograde motion at all. There is a psychological interpretation to a retrograde planet, borne out by correspondence with human experience. Unfortunately, astronomers can’t shake off their superstition and their mindless belief in the strange theories of their paradigm celebrities and attachment to magical machines particularly mechanical clocks. Astronomy debunked by its painstaking effort to use ever more complicated sets of epicycles to approximate ellipses. This shows how dogged these misguided, superstitious pseudo-scientists can be in their loyalty to their theory. Like most paradigm celebrity stars of astronomy, Ptolemy was great at mathematical calculations and quite weak on theoretical explanations.
His Tetrabiblios or four books about astrology are particularly poor work. His syllogism went: The stars influence the weather. Weather influences human behavior. Therefore, the stars influence human behavior. Clearly he confused external objective influences like strong winds and temperature with the inner subjective psychology of character. How one reacts and relates to the weather is far more important than just the so-called temperature or wind chill.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Ptolemy lived in Alexandria Egypt when the Greeks ruled and the great research institution The Museum was going strong. He heard about astrology from local Egyptians, but clearly he never understood it at all. To be fair, it is only with reference to the concept of timing, to timing maps, timing analogs and timing cycles integrated with the Big Bang theory of a single unified swirling solar system that astrology takes perfect scientific shape.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
But astronomers starting with Ptolemy are fascinated by their measurements of star positions and easily persuaded to believe all sorts of nonsense. Constellations are not at all real. They are simply convenient memory-joggers for apparent positions viewed from Earth. Astronomers attack astrology for using the same signs as in Ancient times, when the stars in the constellations have changed their position over the millennia.
That isn’t a problem for astrologers; their signs are based on counting a cycle of 12 starting with the vernal equinox. The astrologer’s 12 signs are still completely accurate. Astrologers are unconcerned about precession of the equinoxes relative to the patterns of the fixed stars. Astrologers debunk astronomy for superstitious idolatry of Ptolemy’s mythical constellations. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Ptolemy’s constellations are miscellaneous collections of stars, nebula and galaxies from many far flung locations in reality. Their only connection is that they appeared in the sky about the same general area. These accidental collections were associated with various figures from Greek mythology. Those constellations which included the ecliptic were named for mythological characters, mostly animals so the Greeks called it the circle of animals or Zodiac.
Astronomers still keep use the term draconian month (referring to the cycle of the lunar node) which relates to eclipses in terms of the mythological Draco or dragon believed to eat the moon as the sun’s shadow falls across the full moon during an eclipse. They say they are joking in their other references to the eclipse shadow as a bite mark and the full moon as a cookie (filled with green cheese perhaps in astronomers’ imaginations?) It is not just a “technical” reference. Astronomers still are secretly caught up in their superstitious ancient roots.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astrologers do not follow the superstitious attachment to the mythological constellations. Their zodiac signs are the 12 geometrical divisions of the circle of the ecliptic based on the four cardinal points of the solstices and equinoxes. These determine the seasons which astrologers believe to be important in the growing of crops and the adjustment to the climatic changes from summer to winter and back again.
Astrology is based upon symbolic interpretation of various cycles as they can be projected upon a circle. All sorts of relevant cycles are represented together in a single circle. This follows from Euclid’s axiom that all circles are similar. The horoscope wheel is a circle with 12 spokes, four of which are highlighted as the perpendicular axes or angles of the chart. In terms of the signs, these correlate to the cardinal points of the Planet Earth, the two solstices and two equinoxes.
Astronomers have yet to integrate their various paradigms and celebrity stars into the Big Bang reality. Ptolemy, Newton, Einstein came to their theories will all sorts of logical flaws and incomplete theory. Astronomy debunked by the actual discoveries of each of these paradigm celebrities. Skeptical logic applied to their own work shows their errors. Each of them tripped up by their own loose ends. Astronomers don’t notice these glaring potholes in their yellow brick road of superstition and mindless belief. They still follow along trying to reach their Great Wizard out there in the Great Beyond.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
They decry astrology for not following their lead, joining the blind leading the blind into pit falls. Ptolemy, Copernicus, Newton, Einstein all are completely obsolete today but still their beliefs are clung to by astronomers. Big Bang theory was unknown to all of them. It is Big Bang theory with its process of forming the entire solar system from a single swirling mass that explains the real basis of astrology, the mapping of timing cycles and currents still remaining in the set of solar system entities. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Bode’s law illustrates a facet of this overall solar system pattern. Astronomy has yet to integrate Big Bang theory and figure out the meaning of Bode’s law. Astrology has it worked out already for its purposes. Astrologers await astronomers brining their pseudoscience in line with reasonable astrological practice. First they will need to clean our the superstitions they still hold to so tightly, like gravity and General Relativity. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Is gravity a great science discovery by Newton? No! He admitted it was medieval superstition he could not believe. He still craftily fought to keep Leibniz’s work from being recognized. On his death bed Newton was proudest of depriving the science world of the ideas of Leibniz and himself of sex with any woman. The heart of Newton’s so-called laws is his equation for Newtonian gravity, F (gravitational force)= G (Newton’s constant to be found only by trial and error) times the mass of the Earth (unknown and not following as expected from known density of available oceans and dry land) times the mass of the Sun (not known at all in Newton’s time) divided by the radius of the Earth’s orbit squared.
The inverse square relationship was simple enough to be understood by scientists and complex enough to give an air of sophistication. Those who are familiar with geometry may note this inverse square relation is nothing more than the rule of thumb to adjust what you will be able to measure at some point on the surface of the Earth globe to the total force of gravity at the point center of the Earth as a sphere.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
What we experience as gravity arises from the complex angular motion of the Planet as it hurtles from the Big Bang still part of the swirling material that long ago settled out as the solar system. This motion is effectively the motion of the center of the Earth hurtling through space with the rest of the Solar System. To connect this inaccessible point source to where it would be possible to place measuring apparatus, on the surface of the earth or anywhere else, requires an inverse square relationship.
This equation of Newton’s merely calculates how the total force at the point center of the Earth could be disbursed over the entire spherical surface where humans live. It has no physical reality, just an adjustment so that values measured by instruments will be validated.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
This equation was elevated to the central “Law of Nature” for purely political reasons of Newton’s personal friends of the British Whig party. Their line was that Newton the Englishman had rewritten the Laws of Nature making the old views of the Pope and Continental rulers obsolete.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Falling objects were important to Newton whose doctor had him placed out in the sunshine in his family apple orchard in a metal brace since the boy was so sickly he couldn’t hold his head up. Young Newton was forced to view the sun shining upon him the only medicine his doctor knew for his problems. Locked in the same position for days on end, the occasional falling of an apple from one tree or another was the only interesting change.
Eventually he noticed that the path of these apples, differing as the fell from trees nearer or farther from him, was similar to the path of the setting sun in the far, far distance. This insight, that the path of the sun could be described similar to the path of falling apples, was the essence of his discovery. He grew up, learned to put his idea into mathematical form and became the ultimate English physicist.
Astronomy debunked by the experience of every infant that a grasped object falls down when dropped. This can be explained by simple logic not requiring all the complications and mumbo jumbo of Newton and his laws of nature. Newton missed the true import of his youthful insight—everything on Earth is falling around the sun. The path of the apple near, far or the setting sun very far away were all just falling as part of the same solar system motion from the Big Bang explosion.
The logical explanation of everyone’s experience of the force of gravity is just this: anything (from an atom to a baby’s rattle to a mountain top) that did not fall toward the center of the Planet Earth when dropped would have been left behind when that geometrical center and all the rest of the Planet Earth went careening off into space on its complex path out from the Big Bang. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
The path of the Earth is not simple or straight in any way. If you don’t keep up exactly in lockstep with every other atom around you could never find your way back to where the Planet Earth is in the next moment. This simple reality of gravity would be obvious to any nomadic child who also must always keep track of and keep up with his moving tribe. Not simple enough to penetrate the superstition and pseudoscience of astronomers or astrophysicists.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Newton was a fanatic in many things, his Anglican religion with the English King as head of the Church of England in opposition to the Pope as head of the rest of the Church in the rest of Europe. Given the post as Master of the Mint as a royal favor and sinecure, he personally oversaw the exquisite torture of those he felt disrespected him by messing with his coinage.
Astronomy debunked by the peculiarities of its central figures. Newton’s inflated ego insisted upon controlling every appointment to a Royal University, the Royal Society of scientists and everything else he possibly could. Newton’s insistence that only those who accepted his theories and revered him personally as the true father of science and its secular patron saint, held back English science for at least a century in Stephen Hawkins opinion.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Simple logic eliminates the need for Newton’s new Law of Nature or of Universal Gravitational force. Even his definition of a concept called mass separate from weight is only of interest to those for whom weight is too complex a concept. Separating weight into mass and gravitation acceleration is necessary in Newton’s misconception of reality.An earthy material has to be inert as part of the non-heaven terra firma. An external gravitational force must push it to have weight--g the acceleration due to gravity. Not of an instant realizing that this is unnecessary once it is understood the solid Earth is in constant motion.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
A gravitational field about the Earth is needed to maintain the notion of the Earth as the fixed center of the Universe. If the Earth were fixed, then only a gravitational field exerting force on objects would account for gravity. Upon the Planet Earth as a spinning, careening blue marble as it is the notion of gravity is just nonsense.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Newton believed Copernicus’ theory of the Earth as a planet orbiting about the Sun with an elliptical orbit. However, none of those great scientists truly believed the fixed bedrock terra firma under their feet could possibly be flying through space. The equations were simpler that way, but real personal belief eluded all astronomers. Copernicus, Newton, Einstein all continue to think in terms of a fixed Earth within a limited universe with the feet of God’s Throne in Heaven sitting atop the outer limit of the sphere of fixed stars. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.

Not all that sensible a view, but we are talking about astronomers and physicists, peculiar superstition-ridden pseudo-scientists of the strangest order. Any doubt of that? Take a look at these remarks from and about the current European Space Agency seeking money for their costly space missions :
"The European Space Agency has an essay published on the WWW entitled What Is Gravity? It accepts the view that because apples fall to the ground gravity must therefore attract. Here is a quote from Newton himself disagreeing with what is taught in every current science class: “That gravity should be innate, inherent and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one another, is to me so great an absurdity that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it”. Newton to Bentley 1692Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Of course, there is Einstein’s theory of General Relativity which is supposed to fix all the problems in Newtonian gravitation: “It then goes on to posit General Relativity as an explanation for why gravity attracts but without saying how it attracts.. “We understand that gravity is a purely attractive force - it can only pull, never push - and that it is generated by any object with mass. ...Albert Einstein developed The Theory Of general Relativity in which he described gravity as a deformation in space, caused by the presence of massive objects, similar to the way a heavy ball would warp a sheet of rubber. This deformation 'told' smaller things how to move through space, so they either went into orbit or fell onto the larger celestial object.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
The true explanation is very simple but unknown to physics : that we experience the continuing complex motion of the whole solar system and particularly our being part of the Planet Earth as gravity keeping us from being left behind as the Planet whizzes by in Outer Space. Neither a gravitational force field nor a warped sheet of space-time continuum are required or even reasonable.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
This force we are taught in school is gravity, is just the reality of our Planet’s existence from the Big Bang. It requires no equation at all. The quantity of this gravity in an object is its weight, well and ably measured by that high-tech innovation of the Ancient World—the pan balance.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
The mechanical pendulum clock imagined by Galileo then later built by Huygens was another unnecessary play thing Astronomy debunked by its weird theories and primitive mechanical contraptions. Truly accurate time is kept by a sundial with all the complexities of the changing hours and days of real timing. The point of the pendulum clock is that it will measure out roughly equal “seconds” whether the weight that powers it is at the top or bottom of its height. This makes for consistent measurement and comparisons from various clocks. That is vital to synchronize urban activities, but not all that useful to keeping in tune with the larger timing of reality. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
All mechanical clocks require synchronization to keep together urban and factory activities related to the simple numerals and counted out time measure as important to business and social order. Even the various kinds of atomic clock must be synchronized to established calculations and expectations at least once each day in the GPS system. What does this arbitrary counting measure--abstract duration. What connection does it have to the complexities of solar system timing? None. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Big Bang theory is new and still developing. Its support for timing cycles and astrology belongs to the future when this new millennia and Great Age are better understood and the superstitions and pseudoscience of the prior millennia worked out of the science textbooks. This will take awhile and awaits some new student to write the paradigm best seller to fulfill the expectations of a properly structured scientific revolution. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Their antique beliefs make the theories of all the founders of astronomy: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, and Einstein obsolete.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astronomy never managed to integrate its own new observations into their theories. Astronomers attack astrology based upon astronomers beliefs in Ptolemy on both astronomy and astrology. He was correct about neither. He is just the celebrity star of astronomy. All the new discoveries just pile up as anomalies awaiting a new generation and a new best-seller publication Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Those journalists and scientists who have looked into astrology with an open mind have almost all become convinced that it works amazingly well at what it does—describe human character and predict when and how particular times will have special meaning to individuals. Astrology is the study of individual psychology in relation of society in general through the use of the horoscope wheel to map timing.
And what is astronomy? Weird superstitious beliefs in theories that never made sense and peculiar devices like mechanical clocks. Industry and urban markets have made useful organizational (regimentation) tools of the mechanical clock, but its use for the theoretical basis of science is highly suspect. The notion that time is a form of motion, to be counted out as a series of abstract numbers bends science to fit in the first primitive instrument available.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astrology is all about timing using the planetary positions as hands on a clock for timing cycles. No Stellar rays or strange influences from the stars. That was nonsense believed by Ptolemy and followed only by astronomers and their imaginary pseudoscience. Time is not very well known to modern science and its superstition of the mechanical clock. Time is important since it is the one entity that continues to change in the same way and at the same rate or sequence no matter what. This inevitable change aspect of time is lost in the working of the mechanical clock which counts only repetitions of its own clockwork mechanism. As a concept it is fatally flawed. How do you know that any two clockworks are counting out the same rate of time? You can’t and folks don’t. They simply reset their clocks to some agreed standard to keep them in line with more general expectations.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Einstein’s relativity began with the problem of synchronizing clocks in various locations. He made the bargain with the Devil to keep Newton’s equations as the immutable laws of physics and let time, space and clocks become infinitely variable. Ultimately, he was only able to point out the inherent inconsistencies and peculiarities of so-called modern physics and astronomy. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astrology is decried in terms of the notion of stellar influence in Ptolemy. But Ptolemy was ignorant of astrology. He thought the stars directly affected the weather and that influence controlled human destiny. The notion of stellar rays affecting the weather is trivially true. The stellar ray is called sunshine. Sunshine does control the weather. But weather has no place in astrology or any horoscope detail.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Ptolemy measured “constellations” apparent grouping of stars as seen from Earth. Galileo looked through the Dutch invention of the telescope and improved its construction trying to make himself rich and famous. He sold telescopes with his new observations. Galileo had a good position as position of mathematics in Pisa. However, they expected him to work hard. A math prof was expected to design fortifications to withstand cannon fire. It was work.
Galileo didn’t want to work hard, he wanted to be a famous celebrity. He sold his discovery of 4 moons around Jupiter to Cosimo I de' Medici the powerful ruler of Florence and patron of the artists and other celebrities and got the celebrity position, fame and an easy life which became the fundamental trait of the modern science he founded. Unfortunately Cosimo did not have a long life and Galileo and already dedicated all his discovered moons.
This left him nothing to sell to a new patron, so he was out of favor. Galileo was persecuted by the Pope, who happened to be a great scientist of the time, not for his views but because one of the Pope’s clerks was irked by Galileo. His celebrity lifestyle was unpopular and this clerk slanted the documents the Pope saw so that Galileo would be condemned.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Each of the paradigm celebrities of modern science had many personal, political and cultural skeletons in their science history closets. They are lumped all together as science Truth and everything else decried as pseudoscience for not falling in line with their lead.The inherent inconsistencies in their work and the various assumptions of the differing cultures and centuries of their work are just ignored. Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Ptolemy’s astronomy is a work of detailed observation of star positions within the accepted philosophical framework of his world. The astrological signs have no connection to Ptolemy’s constellations whatsoever. When astronomers decry astrologers, they are defending Ptolemy who had no idea what or why of the heavens he measured.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
The evidence astronomers have for the objective importance of their study is greatly diminished by the remnants of Ptolemy’s and other antique theories still clinging to astronomy.They have not been able to integrate their theories, having arbitrary constellations jumbled up with big bang theory and with observed radiation and spectroscopic analysis.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Also bits of pendulum clock stuff and relativity saying clocks can’t be synchronized without complex math. The reality that timing is what matters and time is ultimately a totally different philosophical concept is unknown in science yet.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Overall the astronomer is making lists of various measurements done in arbitrary numerals with arbitrary units which are then associated to whatever equations that are available. Hypotheses and theories are developed to try to explain the reason why this equation or another is relevant to whatever work is being paid to get done currently.The astrologer is engaged in a totally different enterprise of symbolic analysis of individual psychology and character through the application of geometrical details to overall cycles of human reality.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
They have no reason to interact with one another, let alone harass each other. It is as though folks who use wristwatches to coordinate freight shipments being picked up and delivered were arguing with folks who use stopwatches in their training of racing thoroughbreds running around a single track. One group saying your time measurements refer to horses never get very far and keep coming back to their starting point. The other shoots back the other folks time measurements have no relation to the development of their transport and keep disappearing off over the horizon rather than staying on track and in sight.Both groups use time pieces of similar size but then hassle each other for having different watch faces and working mechanisms reporting different data.Astronomy debunked Q.E.D.
Astronomy debunked by its own silliness. Astrology is proven by its effectiveness and power to explain personal meaning and character psychology. To learn more try some of the buttons on the Nav Bar. Sabian Astrology is the simplest explanation of this perspective of astrology.

Return to top of astronomy debunked!

|